Judicial Review in Pakistan - Global Trade and Customs Journal View Judicial Review in Pakistan by - Global Trade and Customs Journal Judicial Review in Pakistan 20 3

Recent legal developments in Pakistan’s anti-dumping system have clarified key procedural issues, particularly regarding territorial jurisdiction, appeals, and judicial review timelines. The High Courts, notably in cases like Karachi Iron and Steel Merchants Association v. Anti-dumping Appellate Tribunal and Ashfaq Brothers v. Anti-dumping Appellate Tribunal, confirmed that the Islamabad High Court is the proper forum for appeals against Tribunal decisions. Additionally, the Islamabad High Court ruled that failing to implead necessary parties in appeals could constitute fraud or misrepresentation. The Court also reaffirmed that appeals under section 70(13) of the Anti-Dumping Act 2015 are limited in scope, similar to second appeals under the CPC. Furthermore, the Court emphasized that time-barred appeals cannot be accepted, either by the Tribunal or Constitutional Courts, reinforcing strict adherence to appeal deadlines. These rulings help create a more consistent and structured approach to handling anti-dumping cases, reducing frivolous litigation and ensuring fair enforcement of anti-dumping duties. Ultimately, these legal developments aim to improve the efficiency of Pakistan’s trade remedy system, aligning it with international standards and protecting domestic industries from unfair trade practices.

Global Trade and Customs Journal