This article discusses
judicial review of trade remedy decision in the United States, providing an
overview of procedures and the typical conduct of such judicial review. The
artcle highights those areas where US judicial review differs from the review
in other countries – including the US retrospective sytem, the US bifurcation
of dumping/subsidy and injury decisions to different agencies, and the common
practice of multiple remands to give agencies a new chance to justify their
decision.